Therapeutic Efficacy of a Modified Ketogenic Diet in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Unknown Journal (2025)
Overall Assessment
Weak Methodological Quality
Assessment created by PaperScores Medical AI v0 on Dec 14, 2025
Quick Actions
Quality Dimensions
Bias & Integrity
COI handling, outcome switching, selective reporting
Methods Rigour
Protocol clarity, sampling, controls
External Validity
Generalisability, setting, population
Transparency & Reproducibility
Data/code/materials availability, preregistration
Significance & Novelty
Contribution vs prior art; context if known
Statistical Validity
Models, assumptions, multiplicity, CI priority
Integrity & Transparency
Integrity checks
Signs of selective hypothesis testing or analysis choices that could inflate false positive rates.
Evidence that primary outcomes were changed during or after the study, potentially distorting results.
Authors have financial or other relationships that could bias research findings.
Concerns about the accuracy, completeness, or authenticity of the reported data.
Open science signals
Raw data used in the analyses is publicly available or accessible upon request.
Code or scripts used to analyze the data are shared for reproducibility.
Protocols, questionnaires, and other materials are publicly available.
Premise
Primary Research Question
Does a modified ketogenic diet plus rehabilitation improve ABC and CARS scores vs standard diet in ASD children over 2 months?
Hypothesis
Modified KD will yield greater improvement in ABC/CARS than control.
Hypothesis is Falsifiable
Between-group comparison of predefined scales over fixed period.
PICO Framework
ASD children 2–5 y; DSM-5; hospital setting.
Modified KD using Chi Ketone powder + diet plan; 8 weeks.
Standard diet + same rehab protocol.
ABC and CARS changes; adverse events.
Literature Positioning
Literature Review Balanced
Well coveredCites preclinical, clinical KD literature and ASD context.
Evidence: pp.9–11, refs
Research Gap Clearly Stated
Well coveredStates need for effective ASD interventions; evaluates modified KD.
Evidence: pp.2–3
Stated Contribution Clear
Well coveredRCT assessing modified KD + rehab vs standard diet in ASD.
Evidence: Abstract p.2
Study Provenance
Evidence: p.1 header notes preprint not peer reviewed
Methodological Assessment
No sample size/power calculation reported.
Evidence: entire text searched (none)
Randomised via numerical table.
Evidence: p.4
No allocation concealment described.
Evidence: p.4
Abstract claims double-blind; methods only restrict discussions.
Evidence: pp.2,5
Blinding feasibility with diet unclear; no details.
Evidence: pp.2,5
Intervention diet, product, ratios, titration detailed.
Evidence: pp.5–6,11
ABC and CARS specified pre/post as endpoints.
Evidence: pp.6–7
Registry MR-44-23-041122 given.
Evidence: p.3
Per-protocol; excluded 11 dropouts.
Evidence: p.6–8
Excluded missing; no imputation.
Evidence: p.6
Baseline age/sex/ABC/CARS not different.
Evidence: pp.7–8, Tables 1–3
Ketone/glucose monitored; no adherence rates.
Evidence: p.5–6
Flow numbers and reasons for dropout reported.
Evidence: p.8, Table 4
Diarrhoea and rash reported with rates.
Evidence: p.8, Table 4
Modules without applicable checklist items (8)
These designs were fully marked as not applicable but remain available for reference.
Abstract
<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background</bold> Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by social communication deficits, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors, often accompanied by comorbidities such as epilepsy, sleep disturbances, and gastrointestinal disorders (GIDs). The global prevalence of ASD has been steadily increasing, resulting in significant lifelong treatment costs and substantial societal burdens, underscoring the urgent need for effective therapeutic intervention. Conventional rehabilitation therapies often exhibit limited efficacy and slow progress, particularly in the treatment of comorbid conditions. In recent years, the ketogenic diet (KD) has emerged as a promising intervention, demonstrating both safety and efficacy in managing ASD symptoms in children. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of a modified ketogenic diet in children with ASD through a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, thereby providing a clinical foundation for expanding treatment strategies. <bold>Methods</bold> A total of 62 children diagnosed with ASD and admitted to Hefei Maternal and Child Health Hospital between January 2024 and January 2025 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group using a randomized numerical table method, with 31 children in each group. The treatment group received a modified ketogenic diet (comprising ketogenic nutritional powder and an intervention diet) combined with standard rehabilitation training, while the control group received a normal diet alongside routine rehabilitation training. After a two-month intervention period, changes in autism-related symptoms were assessed using the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) and Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Pre- and post-treatment scores were compared between the two groups. <bold>Results</bold> Baseline characteristics, including sex, age, ABC scores, and CARS scores, showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Following the two-month intervention, both groups exhibited significant improvements in ABC and CARS scores compared to their baseline values (P < 0.05). However, the treatment group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in both ABC (U = 195.500, P < 0.05) and CARS scores (U = 190.500, P < 0.05) compared with the control group, indicating superior therapeutic efficacy. <bold>Conclusions</bold> The modified ketogenic diet, when combined with rehabilitation intervention training, significantly alleviated core symptoms in children with ASD. This approach represents a viable alternative to the classical ketogenic model, with the added advantage of high patient compliance. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term benefits and mechanisms underlying this dietary intervention. <bold>Trial registration</bold>: The Project was registered on MRCTS with the identifier MR-44-23-041122. Registered 06 November 2023, https://www.medicalresearch.org.cn/login/MR-44-23-041122
Quick Actions
Study Overview
Primary classification used to evaluate this research.
Brief summary of who or what was studied.
Number of participants included in the study analyses.
Total number of intervention or comparison groups.
Indicates whether the protocol or trial was registered before data collection.
How participants were allocated to groups: None (no randomisation), Simple (random order), Blocked (groups balanced in blocks), Stratified (balanced within subgroups), Adaptive (allocation adjusted based on previous enrollments).
Who was unaware of group assignments: None (everyone knew), Single blind (participants didn't know their group), Double blind (participants and researchers didn't know), Triple blind (also outcome assessors didn't know).
Which participants were included in analysis: ITT (all randomized, regardless of adherence), mITT (modified ITT, excluding some for valid reasons), Per protocol (only those who completed as planned), As treated (grouped by actual treatment received), Other (alternative approach).
Duration of observation or follow-up for outcomes.
Percentage of participants who did not complete follow-up.
Publication Details
External Resources
Disclaimer: This assessment is generated by AI and should not be the sole basis for clinical or research decisions. Always review the original paper and consult with domain experts.
Suggested Papers
From Our Blog
Interim Analysis: Stopping Too Soon
Stopping a clinical trial early for 'success' sounds ethical. Often, it just exaggerates the results.
Survival Analysis: It's Not Just About Death
How do we measure how long something lasts? Survival analysis handles the tricky math of time.
Regression to the Mean: The Illusion of Improvement
Why do sick people get better after taking a useless pill? It might just be regression to the mean. Don't be fooled by natural fluctuations.